some good points here I thought;
First, all the institutions making exceptional profits do so because
they are beneficiaries of unlimited state insurance for themselves and their
counterparties. As Andrew Haldane of the Bank of England argues, the state has
“become the last resort financier of the banks”. In the UK, total
support amounted to a staggering 74 per cent of gross domestic product. These
must be the largest business subsidies ever.
Second,
the profits being made today are in large part the fruit of the free money
provided by the central bank, an arm of the state. The state is giving the
surviving banks a licence to print money.
Third,
the case for generous subventions is to restore the financial system –
and so the economy – to health. It is not to enrich bankers, particularly
not those engaged in the sorts of trading activities that destroyed the
financial system in the first place.
Fourth,
ordinary people can accept that risk takers receive huge rewards. But such
rewards for those who have been rescued by the state and bear substantial
responsibility for the crisis are surely intolerable. What makes them yet more
so is that the crisis has devastated the prospects of tens, if not hundreds, of
millions of innocents all over the globe. The public finances will be
devastated for decades: taxes will be higher and public spending lower.
Meanwhile, bankers are about to reap huge rewards. This damages the legitimacy
of the market economy.
Fifth, it
is hard to argue in favour of exceptional interventions to bail out the
financial sector at times of crisis, and also against exceptional interventions
to recoup costs when the crisis is past. “Windfall” support should
be matched by windfall taxes.
Finally,
these are genuine windfalls. They are, as George Soros has said, “hidden
gifts” from the state. What the state gives, the state is entitled to
take back, if it is not used for the state’s purposes.
Recent Comments